Source: Wikipedia |
If you remove the references to hierarchy and change 'stateless' to 'weak-state,' you essentially have the Tea Party. Since an extremely weak state is the closest manifestation of statelessness that can be achieved, the difference on that issue is purely theoretical, not practical. With respect to hierarchy, my perceptions are that the Tea Party has a frail alliance with Big Business (and their love of hierarchy) and, were it not for their common Liberal enemy, they would turn on each other post haste.
So for now, I think it may be useful to think of of the Tea Party as burgeoning Anarchists.